Joined
·
39 Posts
*commentary warning*
The car's going to use the gas anyway. What am I really trying to accomplish?
Since 2007, hypermilers like me and car makers like Hyundai have coaxed us into thinking in terms of MPG only. This car gets 40MPG on the the highway; this one only gets 39; we get 28; so does the RAV4.
While all those numbers are accurate, do they really speak to the way we use cars, the way we drive from place to place, run errands, buy groceries?
I don't think so.
I don't ever recall thinking to myself, "I'm go to drive 2 miles to the Walmart, then 10 miles to the Barnes & Noble, then drive a quarter mile in the parking lot to get over to the Target."
Instead, I think to myself, "It'll take me 10 minutes to get to the Walmart. From there, I'll get on the highway, and in another 10 minutes, I'll get to the Barnes & Noble." Nevermind that, for one leg of that trip I'm averaging 25MPH in stop-and-go traffic, but the second leg is a 60MPH highway run.
Furthermore, the highway trip is 10 miles and takes me 10 minutes. The run to Walmart is 2 miles and also takes me 10 minutes, including stops.
In all that time, my driving style will be able to influence total fuel economy by 15% or 20% at most, barring some anomaly like a traffic jam or just hammering the throttle at every traffic light. That's a difference between 23MPG and 27MPG, 30MPG at very best. Significant, but at $4.00/gal, that's a difference of $8 per 200 mile fill-up, $400 a year. It's trivial next to the cost of the car.
For the 24-mile round-trip I described above, the difference between 23MPG and 30MPG is $0.63.
In terms of transportation value, there's no difference between those 10 highway miles that got me 30MPG, or those 2 city miles that got me 23MPG or 20 or 15MPG if there was traffic. The car took me where I was going.
I should make clear that I'm still a hypermiler, and that I still believe the benefits of hypermiling are worth it. And fun. But it seems to me that the obsession--okay, my obosession--with 50MPG vs 40MPG vs 39MPG just fails to tell the whole story. I don't use the car to drive "39 miles;" I use the car to go to the store.
So, if MPG is a bad metric, then what's better? Consumer Reports talks about GPM--gallons-per-mile as a better metric of actual fuel cost. If I'm only spending $30 on a tank of gas for the week, a Prius getting double the MPG can only save me $15 on that fill-up.
It's also important to say the commercials quote highway MPG, which is almost meaningless. Any car can get up to speed and just cruise! City MPG is far more important, because the city's where all the real gas guzzling takes place.
That makes the case for the Prius, other hybrids, and diesels, which access all of their torque at low speeds.
So maybe I'm biased and just consoling myself, since our beloved G2xB has never been a fuel champ, and now has worst-in-class fuel economy. I'm an odd driver with the brains of a hybrid owner and the heart of a boy racer.
But in terms of cost vs. value, the metric of miles per gallon fails to tell the whole story, because the same amount of time in the car can result in a vastly different amount of miles driven. Furthermore, after so much hypermiling, I just cannot seem to influence MPG enough to significantly change fuel cost, partly because fuel amounts to a small part of the total operating cost of the car, even at $4/gal.
The true value of gasoline is not the individual miles, but in the destinations I'm able to reach. If those places are in the city, a lower MPG number returns the same value as a higher MPG number on a highway trip.
The car's going to use the gas anyway. What am I really trying to accomplish?
Since 2007, hypermilers like me and car makers like Hyundai have coaxed us into thinking in terms of MPG only. This car gets 40MPG on the the highway; this one only gets 39; we get 28; so does the RAV4.
While all those numbers are accurate, do they really speak to the way we use cars, the way we drive from place to place, run errands, buy groceries?
I don't think so.
I don't ever recall thinking to myself, "I'm go to drive 2 miles to the Walmart, then 10 miles to the Barnes & Noble, then drive a quarter mile in the parking lot to get over to the Target."
Instead, I think to myself, "It'll take me 10 minutes to get to the Walmart. From there, I'll get on the highway, and in another 10 minutes, I'll get to the Barnes & Noble." Nevermind that, for one leg of that trip I'm averaging 25MPH in stop-and-go traffic, but the second leg is a 60MPH highway run.
Furthermore, the highway trip is 10 miles and takes me 10 minutes. The run to Walmart is 2 miles and also takes me 10 minutes, including stops.
In all that time, my driving style will be able to influence total fuel economy by 15% or 20% at most, barring some anomaly like a traffic jam or just hammering the throttle at every traffic light. That's a difference between 23MPG and 27MPG, 30MPG at very best. Significant, but at $4.00/gal, that's a difference of $8 per 200 mile fill-up, $400 a year. It's trivial next to the cost of the car.
For the 24-mile round-trip I described above, the difference between 23MPG and 30MPG is $0.63.
In terms of transportation value, there's no difference between those 10 highway miles that got me 30MPG, or those 2 city miles that got me 23MPG or 20 or 15MPG if there was traffic. The car took me where I was going.
I should make clear that I'm still a hypermiler, and that I still believe the benefits of hypermiling are worth it. And fun. But it seems to me that the obsession--okay, my obosession--with 50MPG vs 40MPG vs 39MPG just fails to tell the whole story. I don't use the car to drive "39 miles;" I use the car to go to the store.
So, if MPG is a bad metric, then what's better? Consumer Reports talks about GPM--gallons-per-mile as a better metric of actual fuel cost. If I'm only spending $30 on a tank of gas for the week, a Prius getting double the MPG can only save me $15 on that fill-up.
It's also important to say the commercials quote highway MPG, which is almost meaningless. Any car can get up to speed and just cruise! City MPG is far more important, because the city's where all the real gas guzzling takes place.
That makes the case for the Prius, other hybrids, and diesels, which access all of their torque at low speeds.
So maybe I'm biased and just consoling myself, since our beloved G2xB has never been a fuel champ, and now has worst-in-class fuel economy. I'm an odd driver with the brains of a hybrid owner and the heart of a boy racer.
But in terms of cost vs. value, the metric of miles per gallon fails to tell the whole story, because the same amount of time in the car can result in a vastly different amount of miles driven. Furthermore, after so much hypermiling, I just cannot seem to influence MPG enough to significantly change fuel cost, partly because fuel amounts to a small part of the total operating cost of the car, even at $4/gal.
The true value of gasoline is not the individual miles, but in the destinations I'm able to reach. If those places are in the city, a lower MPG number returns the same value as a higher MPG number on a highway trip.