Joined
·
4,338 Posts
I was looking at some suspension parts and noticed that the descriptions for the non-spring or sway part of the interchangable suspension parts is sometimes described as a shock and sometimes as a strut.
I know those terms often get used interchangeable but they are not the same thing.
The internal designs work different and they are used somewhat differently in a suspension design. Suspensions are designed for shocks or struts and they are NOT interchangeable with one another.
"Strut"-> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacPherson_strut
Also, the design of the upper part of a strut is what makes a Strut Bar actually effective.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strut_bar
For contrast:
Shock-> actually short for "Shock Absorber"-> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_absorber
(Wiki used as it provides accurate enough descriptions that are easy to understand and good illustrations.)
I am only aware of this b/c the Miata uses shocks and NOT struts, so a buyer needs to be careful which they get, esp. if buying from a non-Miata parts dealer.
Most cars today use struts, inc. the BMW Z-3 (note that its struts are often listed as a disadvantage compared to the contemporary Mazda soft-top.
I am assuming that they are struts and NOT really shocks and the word usage is from present mis-use of the word shocks to include struts, as they look alike and are used in the same part of suspension system.
So, which do we use?
Edit:
OR am I wrong in my understanding and a strut actually IS a type of shock . . . ?
I know those terms often get used interchangeable but they are not the same thing.
The internal designs work different and they are used somewhat differently in a suspension design. Suspensions are designed for shocks or struts and they are NOT interchangeable with one another.
"Strut"-> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacPherson_strut
Also, the design of the upper part of a strut is what makes a Strut Bar actually effective.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strut_bar
For contrast:
Shock-> actually short for "Shock Absorber"-> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_absorber
(Wiki used as it provides accurate enough descriptions that are easy to understand and good illustrations.)
I am only aware of this b/c the Miata uses shocks and NOT struts, so a buyer needs to be careful which they get, esp. if buying from a non-Miata parts dealer.
Most cars today use struts, inc. the BMW Z-3 (note that its struts are often listed as a disadvantage compared to the contemporary Mazda soft-top.
I am assuming that they are struts and NOT really shocks and the word usage is from present mis-use of the word shocks to include struts, as they look alike and are used in the same part of suspension system.
So, which do we use?
Edit:
OR am I wrong in my understanding and a strut actually IS a type of shock . . . ?